<$BlogRSDUrl$>
Curious Cat Science
Education, Research and Innovation in Science and Engineering.

Why Most Published Research Findings Are False

Why Most Published Research Findings Are False by John P. A. Ioannidis

A finding from a well-conducted, adequately powered randomized controlled trial starting with a 50% pre-study chance that the intervention is effective is eventually true about 85% of the time. A fairly similar performance is expected of a confirmatory meta-analysis of good-quality randomized trials: potential bias probably increases, but power and pre-test chances are higher compared to a single randomized trial.
Saturday, September 03, 2005 6:10 AM :: ::
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home

permalink to Why Most Published Research Findings Are False