Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
Why Most Published Research Findings Are False by John P. A. IoannidisA finding from a well-conducted, adequately powered randomized controlled trial starting with a 50% pre-study chance that the intervention is effective is eventually true about 85% of the time. A fairly similar performance is expected of a confirmatory meta-analysis of good-quality randomized trials: potential bias probably increases, but power and pre-test chances are higher compared to a single randomized trial.
Saturday, September 03, 2005 6:10 AM ::
::
Post a Comment
permalink to Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/45951/459517fc402e22ca5929fc46615945aaf4f59e71" alt=""
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home
permalink to Why Most Published Research Findings Are False